Selection (agent-chosen): ['15-135-24,881-00-00', '15-135-25990-00-00', '15-135-26002-00-00']. Selected wells exhibit the highest usable depth coverage with full key curve suites including gamma ray, resistivity, density, and neutron porosity. The top well shows excellent completeness, while the other two provide strong supporting coverage across the field. All avoided wells flagged with quality abort or poor usability.
All three wells abstained from net pay declaration, leaving the field's pay distribution characterized only by a cross-well P50 mean of 47.6 m with a wide 14.2–109.9 m range that reflects well-to-well variability rather than cumulative thickness. The mean net-to-gross of 0.086 underscores a predominantly non-reservoir interval, and with no well providing a definitive pay pick, field-scale resource estimates remain highly uncertain.
Cross-well net pay P50 (NOT a sum — wells are not stacked): mean 47.6 m, median 18.7 m, range 14.2–109.9 m across 3 wells. NTG mean 0.086.
| Well | Status | Tier | Net pay P50 (m) | NTG | Avg PHIE | Avg Sw | Obj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-135-24,881-00-00 ⚠️ | DID_NOT_CONVERGE | bracketed | 14.2 | 0.020 | 0.165 | 0.404 | 2 |
| 15-135-25990-00-00 ⚠️ | DID_NOT_CONVERGE | bracketed | 109.9 | 0.193 | 0.361 | 0.283 | 3 |
| 15-135-26002-00-00 ⚠️ | DID_NOT_CONVERGE | bracketed | 18.7 | 0.044 | 0.182 | 0.386 | 2 |
_No field figures generated._
Withall three wells abstaining from net pay declaration, the field's P50 cross-well mean of 47.6 m (spanning 14.2–109.9 m) and low 8.6% NTG carry profound uncertainty that precludes reliable volumetric assessment. The widest leverage lies in resolving the abstention drivers — whether log quality, contact ambiguity, or petrophysical model gaps — through targeted re-evaluation or appraisal drilling before any development commitment.